We notice what other news sites don’t

Australia - Opinion

OPINION

Social media ban will be used to silence criticism of immigration

If it wasn’t getting bad enough for the Liberals after last week, here we go again with shadow immigration minister Paul Scarr grovelling to the Indian community for more of Mumbai to move to Australia:

If you’ve ever had the displeasure of watching Senate Estimates, Scarr is usually there spamming the attendant Home Affairs officials with questions on why Australia isn’t opening its gates to more of the third world. The Liberals and their “open borders but slower” policy are firmly dead and buried, but that’s old news now.

More of the third world is definitely on their way, as the red part of the uniparty have announced they are increasing the number of student visas as record replacement continues apace:

As you can see, immigration has also killed off most of the Australian private sector, with taxes on unrealised gains about to be the coup de grâce. Slop ASX100 companies who are trying to increase shareholder revenue by 2% a year via lobbying to import their consumer base are the only ones surviving.

Overall, they just don’t care and everything they’re doing to the country now is pure treason – that’s the only valid conclusion at this stage of the game.

The main political point of discussion now is the light speed censorship of the internet across the planet. In Australia, this is being enforced by the under-16 social media ban that was passed last December, which was birthed in 2015 by another Liberal legacy from “Conservative Christ” Tony Abbott – the office of the eSafety Commissioner.

The bill is just the local version of the global Digital Identity that, just like the COVID vaccines, won’t be mandatory – they’ll just take away everything until you comply.

Just like you’re getting the Voice at the state level despite overwhelmingly rejecting it nationally, you’re also getting Digital ID whether you voted for it or not (like immigration, it was never on the ballot to begin with, despite the protestations of some of the commentariat).

Senator Ralph Babet has attempted to get an inquiry up into the new proposed laws, but has been ultimately shot down. He’s also done a pretty good summary of what the whole thing is about.

It also looks like the Misinformation Bill that was withdrawn is making a predictable comeback, along with the Digital Duty of Care Bill which Anika Wells avoided addressing:

So, for those keeping score, we have the Social Media Ban, Digital Duty of Care Bill, Misinformation Bill and various “hate crimes” bills at the federal and state level – as well as bans on Swastikas and jail for raising your arm.

Internet censorship has been on the agenda for years, but has gone from zero to one hundred in a matter of days, with now even Spotify allegedly forcing you to provide an identity to use their service.

“Just get a VPN mate.”

Just like a fake COVID vaccine certificates, this is really accepting defeat and half-compliance.

My gut feeling says Australia will target ISPs and pressure them to attempt to block VPN service providers and IP ranges.

The VPN argument is an interesting one as basically every government and large corporation uses one to keep their information safe. You can even set one up yourself if you know what you’re doing and it isn’t that difficult.

I doubt they will actually be able to effectively block them as the Australian government is retarded at anything IT-related, but in essence it’s still forcing people into a chokepoint and essentially taxing them to use the internet.

You might also want to avoid some VPN services that host in certain countries.

I wouldn’t be trusting Elon Musk either (he talks a big game, but he always caves), as many people are going to go running to Starlink as the solution. Having one global company in control of the internet is about as dangerous as it gets and his use of the Israeli company AU10TIX to verify X user identity is another massive red flag.

More to the point, we already have reports coming out of the UK that the Online Safety Act, which came into effect last week, is being used to censor immigration protests.

The UK Home Office is now also using software to target online criticism of illegals being put up in hotels, despite their own public service warning immigration is now out of control.

That is unsurprising, considering they are out on the streets in force in the UK protesting said invasion:

The same is happening in Austria:

In Australia, being five years behind the zeitgeist, we have foreigners marching across our national landmarks over a foreign conflict that no one outside of the dwindling Sky News viewership gives a shit about.

If the same trend we’re seeing in the UK continues when the social media bill kicks in around December, then criticism of the replacement of Australians will definitely put you on a hate crimes list. Our national broadcaster is already labelling you a national security threat.

The Australian regime has lost control of the immigration narrative now, so effectively the only thing left to do is shut up the people complaining about their country turning into South Delhi.

The question now is, why are they moving so fast all of a sudden?

In my view, in addition to immigration there seems to be some kind of event(s) or something they anticipate happening very soon and they are trying to get ahead of it, and don’t want the public communicating freely about it online.

Is it the actual Epstein list? Something financial? Civil war? We can only speculate, but there’s essentially no other good explanation for this and that the censorship move is an obvious, centrally coordinated, global plan.

Furthermore, there are two topics in Australia and indeed, the entire Anglosphere, which are considered forbidden for criticism and discussion: immigration and Jewish lobbying and involvement in Australian politics. Libertarian MP John Ruddick is certainly finding that out now. Israel and the Jewish lobby’s reputation has been absolutely shredded since October 2023 and I sense that much of this online crackdown is a feeble attempt to stem the bleeding.

While it may seem an impossible task to stop, I agree with the view that this is a massive show of fear and weakness, because the political Overton window has moved rapidly in such a short space of time, particularly on the aforementioned topics.

Decentralisation and apps like Nostr may be the future of the internet and voicing dissent, but in the interim it’s never been more important for you to be dissent maxxing, poasting and trying to stop this current censorship move, however you can.

Header image: Warnings shown to X users as a result of the UK’s Online Safety Act (X).

If you like what we do, please consider making a regular donation:

Related Articles

The Noticer

FACTUAL NEWS, UNCENSORED VIEWS

For submissions and tips, or to advertise with us: 

editor@noticer.news

Popular Opinion
SUPPORT US

If you like what we do, please consider making a regular donation of any size:

With your support we can expand our reach, cover more stories that are ignored, minimised or misrepresented by the corporate media, and get rid of the pop-up ads.

ANALYSIS

Buy Anglophobia using our Amazon affiliate link above to support the British Australian Community and The Noticer

Media Shame File
ART & CULTURE
SCIENCE
TRANSLATIONS