On February 25, 2026, New South Wales Police Minister Yasmin Catley announced that taxpayers will fund 30 new “Multicultural Community Liaison Officers” to help identify hate crimes against migrant communities.
The Liaison Officers (or MCLOs as she calls them) wont be sworn-in police officers, but will consist of well-established members of migrant communities.
This means the MCLOs will consist of random Indian, African, Asian and Arab dudes serving as paid police informants, to provide information on what’s happening in and around their respective communities.
NSW Police Minister Yasmin Catley has announced that taxpayers will fund 30 new ‘Multicultural Community Liaison Officers’ to help identify hate crimes against immigrant communities.
Diversity is our strength. pic.twitter.com/tQo5RPlGMl
— Australians vs. The Agenda (@ausvstheagenda) February 25, 2026
This move is part of a broader effort the government is making to transform state police into antifascist counter-insurgency teams, who are taking a multi-faceted approach to fighting racism.
But everything the Australian government is doing here has been copy-pasted from overseas counter-terrorism strategies, then just repurposed to help support its mass-migration, multicultural agenda.
During military campaigns in the Arab world (fighting the “War on Terror”) establishing relationships with well-networked locals was indispensable to the US Army and its counter-insurgency units, specifically in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In exchange for payment and protection, these locals would provide valuable information about their village, the Taliban, Saddam-sympathisers or other militant groups in the relevant regions.
Gaining influence in certain regions to discourage locals from joining or supporting terror networks was also central to the point of counter-insurgency, since local people were a major resource for anti-American militant groups.
Even though (ironically) the presence of American soldiers in the Middle East actually increased sympathy for insurgent groups amongst locals, counter-insurgency is still a proven effective strategy for building relationships within outsider groups, gathering information, and gaining understanding and influence.
The ultimate point of this activity is to limit access to important resources insurgents need, and to reduce their recruiting power.
But the insurgents in the eyes of the current Australian government do not come from migrant communities. Insurgents are almost always “far-right” and White.
Basically, the government seems to be re-purposing counter-insurgency as a means for state police to learn from and gain influence over migrant community groups, to work with them in their war against racism.
One of their objectives will be to try improving relations within and between different migrant groups, to stop them from committing so much crime and from killing each other, which won’t work but they’ll still spend a lot of money trying.
They’ll do this as part of an effort to protect the doctrine of “multiculturalism”, since examples of migrant crime are many and serve as a major support-generating resource for “the far right”.
“White racists” and anti-Semites will remain the primary “insurgents” police are tasked with hunting, but taking an approach more in line with counter-insurgency will focus on limiting the major resources the so-called far-right uses to generate support.
Basically, the government is expending massive amounts of money and even re-purposing military-grade tactics to try to generate an illusion that multicultural society is a place of harmony and its ideological opponents are akin to a terrorist network.
This is where our taxes go.
Blair Cottrell is a political commentator and fitness coach. You can find him on Telegram.
